2025n1-evidence

30-Month Synthesis

The evolution from confusion to clarity. Pre-theory to integration.


The Three Phases

Phase 1: Pre-Discovery (2023)

September 2023: Created dark room metaphor October 2023: Conceived prosthetic concept November 2023: Articulated "unbroken focus" November 2023: Documented medication effects

Pattern: Describing monotropic experience without vocabulary. Seeking solutions.


Phase 2: Optimization (2024)

Mid-2024: Flow state breakthrough — single-session completion July 2025: Recognized object permanence challenge

Pattern: Learning to work WITH monotropic attention, not against it.


Phase 3: Discovery & Integration (2025)

October 22, 2025: First encounter with term "monotropism" December 2025: Building prosthetic in response

Pattern: Theory validates experience. Prosthetic implements solution.


The Arc

2023-09  │ Dark room metaphor
2023-10  │ Prosthetic concept
2023-11  │ "Unbroken focus" articulated
         │
2024-06  │ Flow state breakthrough
         │
2025-07  │ Object permanence recognized
2025-10  │ ═══ DISCOVERY ═══
2025-12  │ Prosthetic built

Why This Matters

For Monotropism Theory

1. Pre-theory articulation validates theory

I described "unbroken focus" (Nov 2023) 23 months before learning Murray called it "attention tunnelling" (1992).

No contamination from academic framing. Independent validation.

2. Longitudinal documentation

30 months continuous. Pre-discovery → Discovery → Integration.

Shows how theory recognition transforms self-understanding.

3. Ecological validity

Not lab conditions. Real-world. Natural problem-solving context. Authentic articulation.


For Neurodivergent Experience

1. Prosthetic as case study

Concept → Implementation documented. Built in direct response to monotropic challenges.

2. Medication effects

Ritalin as polytropic simulator. "Unbelievable" to see multiple things. Social improvement via attention shift.

3. Strength-based reframing

"80% of my time are super valuable hyperfocused moments."

Disability emerges from environment mismatch, not cognition.


Unique Contributions

What N=1 data provides that academic studies cannot:

Natural articulation — Self-generated descriptions in own words, before knowing terminology.

Temporal depth — 30 months continuous, high-frequency documentation.

Pre-post discovery — Before/after encountering formal framework.

Solution development — Prosthetic from concept to implementation, fully documented.

Contextual richness — Natural problem-solving, real-world contexts.


Limitations

Single subject — Cannot generalize to all monotropic individuals.

Self-selected context — AI conversations, not all life contexts.

Sampling bias — Toward problems/challenges being discussed.


The Bottom Line

Independent description that maps perfectly to academic theory.

30 months before I knew the word, I was describing monotropism in my own words.

That's the evidence.

Quote Archive | The Discovery Arc


← Back to home